
Critical Area Definitions
Each of the critical areas in the analytical framework is defined below:
Administrative Practices
The field of public child welfare provides and uses administrative support functions for the effective attainment, use, and distribution of resources. Administrative functions include but are not limited to finance, information technology, human resources, legal counsel and contract management. The purpose of these support functions is to enable and support the work of program staff in achieving positive outcomes for children, youth and families.
Budget and Finance
The field of public child welfare is able to strategize, leverage, and maximize resources to achieve outcomes. It works to break down barriers in funding cycles and processes that limit its ability to work collaboratively and creatively. It is also fiscally responsible and able to assess and develop strategies to mitigate and manage risk.
Change Management
The field of public child welfare has the ability to assess its performance, self-correct, innovate manage its performance improvement and enhance its ability to achieve positive outcomes. It builds on the strengths of current practice and is responsive to contemporary and emerging issues.
Communications
The field of public child welfare has formalized strategies for communicating both internally and externally. The strategy addresses proactive and reactive communications; provides for formal and informal interactions; and for developing and maintaining relationships with stakeholders and the children, youth and families we serve.
Disparity and Disproportionality
The field of public child welfare recognizes the consequences of disparate treatment and its impact on disproportionality in all areas of its system. In this context, disparity refers to the negative effects of a family's inability to access, use, or receive quality care, resources, services and opportunities to thrive. Disparity means that the observed differences in treatment are unnecessary, avoidable, unfair, or unjust. Since disparities typically result from unjustly allocated or poorly provided resources-insufficient to address the underlying needs-families receiving disparate treatment are at increased risk of experiencing negative child and family outcomes. Families of color have historically endured disparate treatment in this country due to larger societal factors such as institutional racism, poverty and classism.Disproportionality refers to the occurrence of population cohorts as over-or underrepresented in public child welfare relative to their proportion in the general population. Certain racial groups, such as African American and Native American children, are consistently overrepresented in public child welfare compared to their representation in the general population. And while Latino children are nationally underrepresented in public child welfare compared to their proportion in the generally population, they are overrepresented in certain states and counties.
Information Management
The field of public child welfare identifies, acquires, and analyzes formal and informal knowledge within the organization. The field manages and adapts knowledge in a manner that maintains the integrity of the information and makes it accessible and understandable to all relevant parties. The field disseminates knowledge to the right people at the right time to enable performance, encourage innovation, and improve outcomes.
Leadership
The field of public child welfare has a leadership philosophy that is outcome focused. Senior leadership establishes a compelling vision that sets direction and goals, plans and manages change, makes strategic decisions, garners resources, and builds political and community will. Leadership at all levels in the organization, including but not limited to the executive team, senior administrators, supervisors, child welfare workers, and support staff effectively communicates, builds trust, makes sound decisions and improves performance capacity and accountability to achieve clearly defined outcomes.
Practice Model
The field of public child welfare defines how to effectively deliver services to children, youth, and families. The practice model includes the following elements: desired outcomes, principles, theory of change, evidence informed practice, process and quality of care, and service array.Principles
The field of public child welfare has an obligation to behaviorally define and model the basic values of performance with regard to the services provided to children, youth, and families. These values should be relevant to all workers regardless of their professional functions, the settings in which they work, or the populations they serve.
Theory of Change
The field of public child welfare articulates the underlying beliefs and assumptions that guide the delivery of services to produce change and improvement in the lives of children, youth, and families.
Evidence Informed Practice
The field of public child welfare shall follow best practice standards and make appropriate decisions based on the best available research. When specific research is not available to guide practice, practice standards should be based on the best available information and clearly articulated values that reflect the principles of the practice model. All practice standards should include measurable indicators and be consistently monitored and evaluated.
Process and Quality of Care
The field of public child welfare shall develop and expand the use of “best practices” so each child, youth, and family receives the most effective and efficient delivery of service designed to maximize individual functioning and promote community strength and stability. The developmental life cycle of the child, youth and family must be considered in the delivery of services.
Service Array
The field of public child welfare shall provide a range of available services and access to the services necessary to meet the needs of the target population being served.


